 |





|
 |

News For You - February 2003
We have developed this page to give our visitors the opportunity to see what's new, at a glance, in the business world and how it relates to our program. Take a moment to browse and see what's of interest to you!
Female Void at the Top
Great Publishing Pick!
Time for More Women on Corporate Boards
The Effects of Stress
Female Void at the Top
Currently, there are six female CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, the largest
number ever. However, among the 24 best-paid executives working for these
six CEOs, there are only three women. Women have made it to the top tier
of the corporate ladder, but the rungs below are void of any other females.
In an analysis of company filings with the Security and Exchange Commission
by Catalyst, data shows that within all the Fortune 500 companies, 393
have no women among their top five executives.
There are several theories as to why women are so scarce in top executive
positions. “Some executives, both male and female, say they have
trouble finding women with the experience and qualifications needed for
top jobs.” Another theory cites women’s tendency to choose
career paths in staff positions, such as human resources or public relations,
instead of line positions that have direct responsibility for the bottom
line. Also, the lack of women at the top of big companies might be attributed
to “lingering gender bias in Corporate America.” A fourth
reason for women’s absence in top executive jobs deals with lifestyle
choices that interfere with a career.
Although women currently hold few top executive positions, that is expected
to change in the next decade with the continued rise and success of mid-level
female executives now in their 40s. With the majority of top executive
positions earned by those in their 50s, many anticipate a jump in the
number of top female executives within five or ten years.
(USA Today, January 27, 2003).
Great Publishing Pick!
Barbara Marcus is president of Scholastic Book Publishing and Distribution,
a Fortune 1000 company that finished second this year in the National
Association for Female Executives’ (NAFE) list of the ‘Top
30 Companies for Executive Women’. Scholastic earned the honor because
it is the only company where women like Barbara Marcus earn more than
the men. Ms. Marcus proved her worth to the company and earned her high
salary when she played a key role in getting Scholastic one very big book.
Arthur Levine, an editorial director at Scholastic reporting to Ms. Marcus,
found a new book by an unknown and unpublished author at the Bologna Children’s
Book Fair in Italy a few years ago. He called Ms. Marcus and told her
he wanted to bid on the book. The price went much higher than anticipated
and Mr. Levin asked Ms. Marcus if he could stay in the bidding. Ms. Marcus
gave the ok saying, ‘If you really love it, go ahead and bid,’
and Scholastic won the book. The book was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s
Stone that has made Scholastic a major player in the publishing industry.
(The New York Times, February 2, 2003).
Time for More Women on Corporate Boards
The Forum of Executive Women, a Fort Washington, PA women’s advocacy
group, recently reported that women hold just 10.7 percent of board of
director seats in the Philadelphia region’s largest 126 public companies.
This figure falls short of the national average of 12.4 percent of female
corporate board members. Although women are half of the workforce at 50.9%
and make 85% of consumer decisions, they have little to no say in how
companies are managed. With the absence of women on corporate boards,
“too many companies are missing out on serving customers and shareholders
better by tapping new voices… and they risk complacent group-think
by always turning to the same pool of executive talent to devise corporate
strategy, ensure financial accuracy, and safeguard shareholder interest.”
Diversifying corporate boards has been proven profitable and beneficial
to companies. A November 2001 study by the Forum of Executive Women showed
that the Fortune 500 firms with the best record of promoting women to
senior positions, including board of director seats, were more profitable
than those that did not.
(The Philadelphia Inquirer, December 29, 2002).
The Effects of Stress
University of Arizona psychologist David Almeida recently conducted a
study on the level of stress experienced by males and females and the
corresponding relationship to age. The national survey on adult well-being,
supported by the MacArthur Foundation, reveals that women feel more stressed
than men at every age. Between the ages of 25 to 59, women reported stress
on 44% of days, whereas men reported 39% of the time. Also, according
to the study, both genders enjoy a sharp decline in stress after the age
of 60 - from age 60 to 74 women experienced stress on 32% of days and
men on 25%.
Both men and women in the workforce experience comparable amounts of stress,
but “what’s driving the gender difference is that men are
far less likely than women to feel emotional strain from problems of relatives
and friends.” In general, women’s stress revolves around other
people, whereas men’s primary source of stress centers on work-related
issues. The survey sights women’s need to cram too much into each
day as a main source of stress. Also, “women are doing a lot of
invisible work that’s essential to human existence” which
elevates the level of stress experienced.
(Source: USA Today, August 22, 2002).
|
 |